Blog

Despite growing public awareness and policy efforts, gender equality has not yet been fully established in Western societies. Previous research has shown that hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes, which are grounded in traditional gender stereotypes, play a key role in the reproduction of gender inequalities. Whereas, hostile and benevolent sexism among adolescents has been previously studied, limited attention has been paid to social characteristics in understanding the support for these attitudes. In this article, we aim to study how the family, the school and romantic partnerships relate to adolescents’ benevolent and hostile sexist attitudes. We relied on data gathered in 2013 by the Flemish Youth Research Platform and performed multivariate analyses on 755 parent-child dyads (n_> = 342; n₊ = 413). Our results indicate that social characteristics especially matter to explain the variation in benevolent sexist attitudes among girls and hostile sexist attitudes among boys. Among girls, being in a romantic relationship and parents’ traditional moral beliefs was strongly related to benevolent sexism; while for boys, hostile sexism was strongly related to being enrolled in technical and vocational education. In the conclusion, we elaborate on the implications of our findings.

Introduction

In recent years gender equality hasn’t simply gotten expanding public attract, but even offers be an essential coverage situation for the West communities. Yet not, even with lasting services, gender equality have not started totally created in terms of a job rate, work industry reputation, commission, contribution in the choice-and work out ranking, workshare about household and you can childcare (The world Bank, 2011; Eu, 2017). Regardless if several factors put behind these persistent gender inequalities, it’s unquestionable that conventional gender philosophy and you may stereotypes (we.age., gender bias) gamble an option part. Early in daily life, boys, and you may girls was educated how to function, what facts so you’re able to such as or perform and you may just what playthings or attire in order to prefer (Eccles et al., 2000). Throughout the chronilogical age of 4 in order to five years old, students show gender stereotypical preferences that have, like, girls preferring intimate reports and boys bending on more daring of them (Durkin and you may Nugent, 1998). Such gender stereotypes bring cultural meanings, means and you may (role) standard one plan out lifestyle by the commonly (subtly) impacting and you may powering man’s viewpoints, emotions, perceptions, and you can routines (Eckes and you will Trautner, 2000; Ridgeway and you will Correll, 2004). Throughout childhood, this type of gender stereotypes lead to boys and you may girls primarily spending some time which have same-sex co-workers and you will playfully to prevent each other (Powlishta, 2003; ). During adolescence this avoidance games disappears due to the introduction out-of sexual interest and you may an interest in intimacy (Maccoby, 1998; Rudman and you can Glick, 2008). This type of progressing intergroup dating render the research regarding adolescents’ sexist perceptions quite interesting. Sexist thinking and philosophy confine and you will dictate upcoming lives trajectories because of the (often subtly) impacting values, ideas, and you will routines (Eckes and you can AsianDating-app Trautner, 2000; Ridgeway and Correll, 2004). They suggest gender-certain practices and you will roles you to definitely hamper young people’s ability to discern the variety of emotional, public, and you can academic capabilities and solutions which are anticipated (Rainey and you can Rust, 1999; Paul Halpern and you will Perry-Jenkins, 2016). Ultimately, which undermines (policy) work that strive for gender equality (Glick ainsi que al., 2001).

Benevolent and you can Intense Sexism when you look at the Societal Spheres: Brand new Impact of Moms and dads, College and you can Love to your Belgian Adolescents’ Sexist Thinking

As to what societal contexts perform sexist thinking exist after that? Research has not yet thoroughly learned the fresh new you can easily public variation from sexist attitudes one of adolescents. Even with a massive added value during the putting on sense on the sexist thinking, really search with this matter has been generally carried out by psychologists just who will focus on apparently smaller than average homogeneous examples. Mathematically it’s thus started hard to studies the fresh social adaptation of sexist thinking. Early in the day lookup among (young) grownups has revealed that socio-monetary facts such as for example money, occupations position and you can instructional attainment connect with people’s socio-political attitudes (Crompton and you can Lyonette, 2005; Davis and you may Greenstein, 2009; ). Centered on so it, we anticipate that people’s public records issues whenever reading sexist thinking. For this reason, this research aims to mention how socio-monetary and cultural issues relate genuinely to both benevolent and you may hostile sexist attitudes certainly one of teens out of a beneficial sociological direction. I do that by simply following Glick and you can Fiske’s (1996) difference between intense and you may benevolent sexist thinking. To know the brand new socio-financial and you can social history out-of teenagers i separate ranging from ascribed and you may hit social features.